Links
LJ TOOLS
MY COMMUNITIES
July 2009
| |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
| 5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
| 12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
| 19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| 26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
12/22/10 11:06 am
FRIEND LOCKED Comment to gain access.
¡ATENCIÓN! THIS JOURNAL IS NOW PUBLIC AND WILL BE FOR FANDOM USE ONLY. IF YOU WANT TO ADD MY PERSONAL JOURNAL, PLEASE ADD wakeupfaithless.
( what people say about me )
icons by me | last.fm | goodreads | del.icio.us | twitter
12/21/10 12:00 am
Here is my master post of all my major fandom contributions. Yes, I am that full of myself, why do you ask?
( Episode reviews/picspams )
( Icons )
( Communities )
( Fanfiction and recommendation lists )
( Music videos )
( Fanmixes )
7/5/10 12:30 pm
Ask me anything about anything. Comments are screened, anonymous commenting allowed.
7/8/09 02:51 pm
It's no secret that I love spoilers and think the name 'spoilers' isn't appropriate because stuff can't be spoiled for you just by knowing some background info ahead of time. Anyway, I was reading some posts on spnfencentral, which is a spoiler-free SPN news comm where they are so SO anti-spoiler it's to the point of frightening, and some of the post about people freaking out over being spoiled grated me a bit.
For example, someone made a post that was all "I think I just got spoiled by a subject line in supernatural_tv." Ok, 1. if you don't even know it's a spoiler, then it's not a spoiler. You CANNOT be spoiled if you don't even know what they're talking about! and 2. Seriously? One little line is not going to effect anything about an episode when you watch it. Not a single goddamn thing.
So, what is a spoiler to you? At what point does a spoiler become so spoilery that it makes you angry because it spoils something for you? I.E. A title to an episode, an actor/character name, a plot device/happening? The first two to me are in no way spoilers, especially with the titles coming out in season 3, because there is NO WAY you can assume something is going to happen by them. The third one is a "spoiler" to me, but still, you'd have to be pretty fucking accurate in your meta (which is something else I despise) for it to effect your episode watching.
Let me know because I'm really curious. This is something that bothers the hell out of me because there are so many people that are all "OMG I KNOW AN EPISODE TITLE I'M SO ANGRY THIS HAS RUINED EVERYTHIIIIIING." and that is just ridiculous.
7/7/09 03:02 pm

( More 'Sherlock Holmes' promo pics )
--
FINALLY! An HQ version of one of my favourite Jensen pictures:
 CLICK FOR FULL SIZE
7/7/09 02:38 pm
( TV programming schedule (so far) )
I'm actually pretty disappointed with the panel choices this year. I mean, last year I was super excited for all these panels but there's only two on this list. We'll see when the movie panel is released how I still feel, I guess.
...ok? More: http://spoilertv.blogspot.com/2009/07/sons-of-anarchy-season-2-promo-3.html
7/6/09 01:31 pm
From toodelicious: o1. dean/ castiel: any thoughts? Ugh. I hate this pairing. I'm not a huge fan of Micha's face, TBH, so pairing him up with the very pretty Jensen is a no-go for me. And then Castiel is an angel? His body may have a penis but I'm pretty sure that he's asexual and definitely not gay if he were. The entire idea is just ridiculous, imo.
o2. do you like horror movies? It really depends. I'm not a fan of gore movies, but I like horror movies with a plot. My favourite horror genre is definitely psychological thrillers, though. You don't need that much blood and at the end of the movie, you're just like WTFWTFWTF?! I like that haha.
o3. my birthday is on friday - what would you buy me? Happy Birthday! I'm poor as fuuuuuuuuuuuck so I'd tell you to commission some graphics out of me. Or maybe a mix. IDK.
o4. what's your favourite thing to eat? I'm a fatty who loves food. Right now I'm eating a toasted Totinos pizza which I fucking love. And I eat a lot of potatoes and grains - bread, pasta, rice, etc. I love chicken and burgers and and steak. I just like food, man, and the less healthy, the more tasty.
o5. your favourite couple EVER?? Like, IRL couple? I'm not a fan of romance, really, and don't pay attention to who's dating who or who broke up or any of that mind-numbing nonesense. I guess it would be the probably fictional big gay romance between Jared and Jensen haha. As far as like, fictional OTPs go, it would then again be Sam/Dean. Even though I'm in a lot of fandoms, I don't read any slash except in Supernatural and then only between those two. John IS SO STRAIGHT IT HURTS as well as Bobby so I can't slash them and then Castiel is, again, a fucking angel not a fucking angel. I guess Sylar/everyone would be my next one, but that's more for the lols.
Feel free to ask me 5 (or more idc) questions of your own!
--
5 interests/words
from backinblack: Arizona, twitter, Twilight, Pushing Daises, annnnnd CHRIS PINE. ( Read more... )
from kaeilaspn: John Winchester, Sylar, Pinto, Nathan Explosion?, James McAvoy. ( Read more... ) Current Mood: awake
7/5/09 09:17 am
Three new images of Mad Hatter, the Red Queen, and Alice are in the month's issue of Vanity Fair. ( Read more... )
That's as big as I could find so if you want to read the article, just go into your bookstore and read it there. It doesn't seem to be all that long. Or if you find better scans, link me!
7/4/09 01:13 pm
I just installed a shit load of Firefox add-ons and now I'm loading shit twice as fast, can highlight-to-search, got an icon randomizer, tons of added security shit, and stuff that helps me spam Tumblr. BWA HA HA HA.
It's the American Independence Day!
Because I have no friends and no life here in not-so-sunny-right-now Tucson, I will probably be spending it here, with you guys. At least I won't get shot! But I really want some BBQ. :/ AMERICA: FUCK YEAH
7/3/09 08:55 pm
http://true-blood.net/2009/07/03/exclusive-interview-with-raelle-tucker/ Interview with former Supernatural writer Raelle Tucker (currently writing for True Blood), where she talks about SPN, and why she left the show:
[Writing For The Genre] Raelle landed in the supernatural writing genre by accident. She and her writing partner had been offered several jobs and after looking at all of them, they decided that Supernatural was the one “with legs”, so they accepted that. Raelle recalls that she had to do a lot of catching up to write for the show.
“It did not come naturally, at all. We’d sit in the writer’s room and Eric Kripke would reference all these things that were foreign to me. It was like he was speaking Chinese!” She realized that it was not a good fit for her, so ultimately she decided to leave Supernatural and pursue something that she could “put more of my life into”. Raelle remembers that the decision was very difficult, especially with no other jobs lined up, but she knew “it was absolutely the right thing to do.” Look at the episodes she wrote (or co-wrote with Sera Gamble): Dead in the Water, Faith, Nightmare, Salvation, Children Shouldn't Play with Dead Things, Hunted, Roadkill, What is and What Should Never Be... and she thought she didn't know what she was doing?! More than one of these are in my top 10! Also, if she wanted to do something that was more "her" and Supernatural wasn't... how is Tru Blood that different (lol besides being not good)? I ASK YOU. ---- http://www.tvguidemagazine.com/ask-matt/ask-matt-cant-we-just-leave-greys-alone-1566.htmlMatt Roush over at TVGuide.com talked about Supernatural in his column this week: Question: I just recently started following you on Twitter, and I see that you've finally begun to catch up on Supernatural. I'm a big fan of the show and feel that it is one of those hidden gems on the Thursday night schedule many people miss out on, so it makes me very happy to know that you're investing the time to get up to speed on the show. That said, I'm really curious to hear how you are enjoying it. Do you now see why the show has such a devoted following? I love the characters, the monster-of-the-week is often well-crafted (and can be downright freaky!), there's a good mix of scares and humor, and the on-going story arcs have got me deeply invested in catching the next episode. I feel that the show has gotten stronger in its storytelling over the seasons, and the mythology has been able to move beyond the initial mystery behind the murder of the Winchesters' mother which jump-started the series. So, what are your thoughts? If you are having a good time with the show, just wait until you get to season 4. You won't be disappointed! — Brodie L
Roush: Hey, thanks for the Twitter plug. Backstory here: I’ve always known what was good and appealing about Supernatural, which under most circumstances is right up this horror fan’s alley. I followed it pretty closely during the first season, but when it moved to Thursday, I began falling hopelessly behind. My job requires I watch a broad range of programming, and much of the top tier airs in direct competition with Supernatural (the No. 1 procedural following a top-rated reality competition, vs. the top-rated medical soap vs. Emmy-winning comedies, and so on), and when it came to catching up, it still fell behind shows like Battlestar Galactica and a ton of other things. It’s not as if TV Guide Magazine was ignoring Supernatural (we cover it a lot), it was just something I couldn’t find time for. And since I’ve been playing serious catch-up on DVD since the regular season ended, I’m still beating myself up for not having caught some of the more outstanding episodes when they first aired. (I was making really good progress on this summer project on my vacation until I came home to the tidal wave of high-profile celebrity deaths. Hope to find time during the July 4 break to keep going.) I am thoroughly caught up in the brothers’ story now and have become once again a great admirer of Eric Kripke’s enthusiasm for turning horror conventions on their head (the gruesomeness of the faux-cheery Christmas episode in season 3 knocked me out). With Fringe and FlashForward and The Mentalist (among others) joining an already overstuffed Thursday line-up, I can’t guarantee I’ll be watching Supernatural in real time next season. I’m not, after all, a sci-fi/fantasy/horror columnist; I have to prioritize, and on Thursdays, the big hits come first. But my goal is to at least stay current with it and include it as often as possible in my commentaries on the most entertaining shows out there. Supernatural obviously deserves that much attention. Fuck yeah. Also, where can I get a job like that? Goddamn.
7/2/09 01:23 pm
THE MOUSE BUTTON ON MY LAPTOP IS GOING OUT. DSFDSDFSDFSDF.
Anyway.
To begin: list twelve characters you like.
1. John Winchester 2. Cal Leandros 3. Andy Gallagher 4. Ned 5. Dean Winchester 6. Severus Snape 7. Mad Hatter (from Batman) 8. Vincent Valentine 9. Gil Grissom 10. Jack Sparrow 11. Edward Blake (The Comedian) 12 Jasper Hale (HAHAHAHA)
( This is amazing. )
7/1/09 09:48 pm
( 5x02 title )
( Info on a certain casting spoiler )
Check out his moves. What a nerd.♥ AHBL Convention DVD trailer
7/1/09 03:18 pm
Move this from my other post... A new interview from WinchesterBros.Com with Sera Gamble about season 5 (with spoilars!) HERE. TL;DR. Tell me if there's interesting stuff.
BUT BUT BUT BUT!!!!
( S5 Casting Spoiler )
7/1/09 02:50 pm
 Click for bigger.In an interview with Kerrang!, Jesse Lacey (lead singer and songwriter of Brand New) has alluded to possibly leaving the band and/or the band breaking up after doing some touring for this album.  -- For those of you attending San Diego Comic Con, here's a neat Comic Con survival guide. Some of it is common sense, but other stuff - I always fucking forget my poster tube! - is stuff you wouldn't even think about. If you're interested, information for the Zombie Walk is also up. Just Google it. It's a yearly tradition that I've never participated in, but it's fun to see. -- SO MANY AMAZING PEOPLE. I want to see this so bad. ;_; --
6/30/09 07:37 pm
 Raining Cats and Dogs: OriginThis is an interesting phrase in that, although there's no definitive origin, there is a likely derivation. The phrase isn't related to the well-known antipathy between dogs and cats, which is exemplified in the phrase 'fight like cats and dogs', nor is the phrase in any sense literal (i.e. it doesn't record an incident where cats and dogs fell from the sky, obv). Small creatures, of the size of frogs or fish, do occasionally get carried skywards in freak weather. Impromptu involuntary flight must also happen to dogs or cats from time to time, but there's no record of groups of them being scooped up in that way and causing this phrase to be coined. Not that we need to study English meteorological records for that - it's plainly implausible. One supposed origin is that the phrase derives from mythology. Dogs and wolves were attendants to Odin, the god of storms, and sailors associated them with rain. Witches, who often took the form of their familiars - cats, are supposed to have ridden the wind. However, there doesn't appear to be any to support this notion. It has also been suggested that cats and dogs were washed from thatch roofs during heavy weather. Thick straw, piled high, with no wood underneath. They were the only place for the little animals to get warm. So all the pets; dogs, cats and other small animals, mice, rats, bugs, all lived in the roof. When it rained it became slippery so sometimes the animals would slip and fall off the roof. This is nonsense, of course. It hardly needs debunking but, lest there be any doubt, let's do that anyway. In order to believe this tale we would have to accept that dogs lived in thatched roofs, which, of course, they didn't. Even accepting that bizarre idea, for dogs to have slipped off when it rained they would have needed to be sitting on the outside of the thatch - hardly the place an animal would head for as shelter in bad weather. Another suggestion is that 'raining cats and dogs' comes from a version of the French word 'catadoupe', meaning waterfall. Again, no evidence. If the phrase were just 'raining cats', or even if there also existed a French word 'dogadoupe', we might be going somewhere with this one. As there isn't, let's pass this by. There's a similar phrase originating from the North of England - 'raining stair-rods'. No one has gone to the effort of speculating that this is from mythic reports of stairs being carried into the air in storms and falling on gullible peasants. It's just a rather expressive phrase giving a graphic impression of heavy rain - as is 'raining cats and dogs'. The much more probable source of 'raining cats and dogs' is the prosaic fact that, in the filthy streets of 17th/18th century England, heavy rain would occasionally carry along dead animals and other debris. The animals didn't fall from the sky, but the sight of dead cats and dogs floating by in storms could well have caused the coining of this colourful phrase. Jonathan Swift described such an event in his satirical poem 'A Description of a City Shower', first published in the 1710 collection of the Tatler magazine. The poem was a denunciation of contemporary London society and its meaning has been much debated. While the poem is metaphorical and doesn't describe a specific flood, it seems that, in describing water-borne animal corpses, Swift was referring to an occurrence that his readers would have been well familiar with: Now in contiguous Drops the Flood comes down, Threat'ning with Deluge this devoted Town. ... Now from all Parts the swelling Kennels flow, And bear their Trophies with them as they go: Filth of all Hues and Odours seem to tell What Street they sail'd from, by their Sight and Smell. They, as each Torrent drives, with rapid Force, From Smithfield or St. Pulchre's shape their Course, And in huge Confluent join'd at Snow-Hill Ridge, Fall from the Conduit, prone to Holbourn-Bridge. Sweeping from Butchers Stalls, Dung, Guts, and Blood, Drown'd Puppies, stinking Sprats, all drench'd in Mud, Dead Cats and Turnip-Tops come tumbling down the Flood. We do know that the phrase was in use in a modified form in 1653, when Richard Brome's comedy The City Wit or The Woman Wears the Breeches referred to stormy weather with the line: "It shall raine... Dogs and Polecats". Polecats aren't cats as such but the jump between them in linguistic rather than veterinary terms isn't large and it seems clear that Broome's version was essentially the same phrase. The first appearance of the currently used version is in Jonathan Swift’s A Complete Collection of Polite and Ingenious Conversation in 1738: "I know Sir John will go, though he was sure it would rain cats and dogs". The fact that Swift had alluded to the streets flowing with dead cats and dogs some years earlier and now used 'rain cats and dogs' explicitly is good evidence that poor sanitation was the source of the phrase as we now use it. Thank you, Jonathan Swift, for all you've done for language.
6/30/09 12:49 am
Season 3: 'Long Distance Caller' - the scene where Sam is going to leave Dean in the motel room to go talk to the teenage girl, and Dean is mad because he's waiting for 'John' to call about the location of the supposed demon. Watch the actual scene here. Check out the GIANT camera operator guy at the end. Alternate official title sequence that was never used. It's fucking amazing and I like it way better than the fire or the feathers they use now. Screencaps here. Also, gembat made this hilarious video: My favourite part is when Sam gets all flustered from saying "OH MY GOD" in front of Castiel and Uriel.
|